We 
                    often hear of "speaking in tongues." What is speaking 
                    in tongues and how do people learn it? 
                   "Speaking 
                    in tongues," or glossolalia, is one of the gifts 
                    of the Holy Spirit mentioned by Paul. It refers to ecstatic 
                    utterance, when the Spirit of God is perceived as speaking 
                    directly through a person. It must be paired with "interpretation 
                    of tongues," so that what God intends to communicate 
                    can be understood. 
                    
                    Tongues was a significant problem in the early Church. Read 
                    1 Corinthians 12 & 13. Some felt themselves superior to 
                    others because they spoke in tongues. Paul's response was 
                    to say that love matters more than ecstatic utterance. Even 
                    today, churches that focus on speaking in tongues sometimes 
                    claim special status. 
                    
                    Spiritual gifts are conferred by the Holy Spirit, not sought 
                    by the believer. The point is to discern what gifts God has 
                    given you and use it or them to the best of your ability. 
                    
                    
                    Speaking in tongues isn't what Acts 2 is about, by the way. 
                    The point of the Day of Pentecost was that common Galileans 
                    were suddenly able to speak in the many languages of the known 
                    world, a restoration of what had been lost at Babel, when 
                    God punished the people by confusing their languages. 
                  
                  (Return 
                    to Top)
                  
                  Does 
                    the church acknowledge the validity of the Gnostic scriptures? 
                    Would you discourage a church member from reading them for 
                    inspiration? Would a leader in your church be allowed to openly 
                    pursue them for their wisdom?
                  Yes 
                    and no. There's no doubt that the Gnostic Gospels exist, despite 
                    efforts by early church leaders to burn every copy of the 
                    Gospel of Thomas and to suppress the rest. Indeed, some Johannine 
                    scholars see signs of Gnosticism in the Gospel of John. This 
                    was a major movement at one time. Elaine Pagels has studied 
                    this movement in depth in her book The Gnostic Gospels.
                    
                    So, yes, they are valid in that they were written by early 
                    Christian thinkers and they reflect major theological strands 
                    of the times. 
                    
                    The Church, however, has declared them heretical, perhaps 
                    more fervently so in the early years when it felt threatened 
                    by Gnosticism. Every now and then even today, when a theological 
                    argument ventures onto unorthodox ground, some traditionalist 
                    is certain to label it "Gnostic."
                    
                    My opinion—shared by many progressive Christian thinkers—is 
                    that Gnosticism reveals much about the state of the early 
                    church. It wasn't fanciful, but rather a sober, reasoned response 
                    to Jesus. I think it helps us to know about that response. 
                    The Gospel of Thomas, for example, ends with an impassioned 
                    diatribe against women. Knowing about that mindset might help 
                    us to understand how women went from center-of-the-circle 
                    with Jesus to marginalized, secondary status in the early 
                    Church. 
                    
                    Today, in most progressive denominations, students and others 
                    are encouraged to be aware of the Gnostic writings. 
                  
                  (Return 
                    to Top)
                  
                  My 
                    best friend just lost a dear friend of hers whom she thought 
                    of as a
                    great grandma. I was hoping you could help me with my condolences 
                    and
                    send me a few tips on how to keep her spirits up. Please help 
                    me to help
                    her.
                  The 
                    key to any expression of condolence is love. If your friend 
                    feels loved, then it won't matter much whether you found the 
                    perfect words. 
                  I 
                    would suggest two things. First, I would discourage blaming 
                    death on God. I know it sounds helpful to say that God "called 
                    her home," or "needed her more," or "took 
                    her to a better place." But death just happens, from 
                    a variety of causes, and God is there to be our help in time 
                    of trouble, not the cause of our troubles. Many a person has 
                    come to hate God because they blamed God for taking away someone 
                    they loved.
                  Second, 
                    the greatest help we can give in time of grieving is to allow 
                    grieving to happen. Lifting a person's spirits may not be 
                    what they need. It might be what the people around her need, 
                    because they are distressed by her pain, but she herself probably 
                    needs to go through the stages of grieving, which include 
                    denial, bargaining, anger, depression (or sadness) and acceptance. 
                    Any attempt to go straight to acceptance usually delays the 
                    actual grieving. If your friend is sad, maybe what she needs 
                    is a companion in her sadness, not someone trying to talk 
                    her out of sadness.
                    
                  (Return 
                    to Top)
                  
                   
                    I've 
                    enjoyed reading many of Marcus Borg's books and am currently 
                    reading The Meaning of Jesus. I've only read bits 
                    and pieces of the Gospel of Thomas and am confused by it. 
                    Where can I find more information on the Lost Gospels?
                  A 
                    book that I found helpful was From Jesus to Christianity 
                    by Michael White, of the University of Texas. Elaine Pagels' 
                    book, The Gnostic Gospels, is another useful volume. 
                    
                     
                  (Return 
                    to Top)
                  
                  
                                     How 
                    is it that there are so many differences in beliefs and only 
                    one Christ? How does one know what these differences are so 
                    they know what faith makes sense to them? 
                  Differences 
                    have marked the Christian experience from the days when Jesus 
                    went about with the disciples. Even those men and women saw 
                    Jesus through the uniqueness of their personalities, intellects, 
                    needs and expectations. Zealots (Jews seeking the overthrow 
                    of Rome) saw Jesus as a fellow Zealot. The Pharisees were 
                    surprised that he wasn't more like them. James and John saw 
                    Jesus as a source of power that they would share. Mary Magdalene 
                    saw him as beloved. 
                  In 
                    the Book of Acts, you can read how the Christian world began 
                    to divide between Jewish-Christians and Gentile-Christians. 
                    Within those basic divisions were others. The Church in Syria, 
                    for example, had books that other regional communities didn't 
                    have. A way of seeing Jesus known as Gnosticism became popular, 
                    until a Bishop named Irenaus waged doctrinal war against it. 
                    
                    Later came divisions between a Western Church and an Eastern 
                    Church, which we know as the division between Roman Catholicism 
                    and the Orthodox tradition (e.g. Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox.) 
                    Each saw Jesus in different ways and worshiped him differently. 
                    
                  Later 
                    still came the national churches arising from the new sovereignty 
                    of Germany, France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Scotland 
                    and England. From them came the Lutheran, Huguenot, Calvinist, 
                    Presbyterian and Anglican traditions. In the United States, 
                    we have well over 300 separate Christian denominations. 
                  The 
                    cause of this remains what it was at the beginning: people 
                    seeing Jesus through their unique personalities, intellects, 
                    needs and expectations. Add to that class and racial awareness, 
                    as well as gender and educational. 
                    Is this a problem? Not really. It can make it difficult to 
                    find a congregation in which you feel comfortable. But as 
                    Paul said, we all have different gifts, different ways of 
                    serving God. The body of Christ needs every one of us.
                  
                    (Return 
                    to Top)