EXPLORE 
              THE CHURCH 
              What 
              if I am troubled by the negative attitudes toward women that I find 
              in the Bible and in some churches today?
            For 
              reasons that I think we are still straining to understand, the Bible 
              and its attendant institutions—Judaism and Christianity—are 
              highly conflicted over women. Some of that has to do with the power 
              of sex to claim and often to corrupt human lives. Some is males' 
              fear of that which makes women unique, such as menstruation and 
              childbirth and the intuitive dimension of faith often credited to 
              women. Some has to do with power and control. Some has to do with 
              an ancient habit of seeing the masculine as good and the feminine 
              as evil. 
            On 
              the one hand, the Old Testament seems to fall into those conflicts, 
              devoting much of Torah to regulating lust and property by regulating 
              the sexual behavior of women, assigning women a fundamental inferiority, 
              and blaming women for some evil. On the other hand, some of the 
              early judges were women, indicating that women were fit to rule; 
              God dealt graciously with Sarah and the various women associated 
              with her offspring; some women like Ruth were held up as models 
              of integrity; and the sight of the daughters of Zion welcoming their 
              men home from exile suggests partnership, not subservience.  
            Jesus 
              clearly intended to break through ancient hierarchical practices 
              concerning women. He welcomed women to his inner circle, treated 
              women as disciples on a par with the male disciples, 
              had close relationships with several women and, it appeared, a special 
              relationship with Mary Magdalene, the first witness of the resurrection 
              in John's Gospel. His mother was a leader in the apostolic community 
              and probably was the source of Luke's Gospel.  
            It 
              seems highly unlikely that Jesus intended the male-dominated institution 
              that arose in his name. Why did it happen? Male dominance reflected 
              the attitudes of Paul, as well as the traditions of Judaism (in 
              which Christianity began) and the Roman world. Fear of women replaced 
              Jesus' openness to women. Accompanying that was fear of sexuality, 
              fear of the intuitive (as in Gnosticism) and fear of power dispersed 
              among the people.  
            In 
              recent years, arguing about women's roles in church has been a convenient 
              way to argue about change, modernity and questions about hierarchy 
              and power. One way for any institution to sell the concept of control 
              has been to establish the necessity of controlling certain groups. 
              In the church, that surrogate for all control issues has been women. 
               
            Some 
              Protestant denominations are making a noble effort to move away 
              from ancient hierarchical patterns. It is tough 
              sledding and probably will require several generations to achieve. 
              My suggestion is that you explore those congregations that are trying 
              to move forward, that you not get hung up on past practices (which 
              can't be redone), and that you accept responsibility for developing 
              a relationship with God that doesn't depend on harmful assumptions 
              and practices. In the end, what Christians did in former times has 
              little to do with you. Your time is now. 
            --Tom 
              Ehrich  
             
              
  |